最后的直男

剧情片美国2014

主演:马克·奇尼洛  本杰明·鲁茨  斯科特·塞尔  大卫·阿兰森  布莱恩·诺兰  布莱克·哈里森  

导演:马克·贝森格尔

播放地址

 剧照

最后的直男 剧照 NO.1最后的直男 剧照 NO.2最后的直男 剧照 NO.3最后的直男 剧照 NO.4最后的直男 剧照 NO.5最后的直男 剧照 NO.6最后的直男 剧照 NO.13最后的直男 剧照 NO.14最后的直男 剧照 NO.15最后的直男 剧照 NO.16最后的直男 剧照 NO.17最后的直男 剧照 NO.18最后的直男 剧照 NO.19最后的直男 剧照 NO.20
更新时间:2023-09-15 01:43

详细剧情

刘易斯是一个出柜的同性恋男子,他暗恋他最好的直男朋友库伯。在单身派对上,一夜醉酒发生关系后决定在一起后,两人在每年赶上同一天晚上同一酒店套房见面。在过去的十二年中,我们看到四个难忘的夜晚,描绘了两人的成长和他们的友谊的变化。

 长篇影评

 1 ) 最后的直男:“非正常拍摄”的Video

这篇文字,单纯想记录个人的胡思乱想

这部片子,我很久之前就在豆瓣上面看到了推荐,最近春节新冠病毒爆发,窝在家里哪也去不了,剧荒,就下载下来看了。

这片真的是奇特!这是给我的第一感觉。也可能是我平时看的独立电影不多,“我是不惮以最奇葩的角度去揣测导演的” ,但我没想到这个电影会这么特别……我整个观影过程,都在把它判为“gay porn video”,“烂片”,“神片”之间摇摆徘徊。

影片第二部分(暂且这么说,看过的就知道了)的拍摄方式,让我直接联想到《网络迷踪》还有CCTV12的《法律讲堂》里经常穿插的“非正常拍摄”……

因为这个独立电影的场景布置基本就是没有场景布置,整个电影的演绎就在同一个酒店套房里……所以可能会显得没那么“场面儿”。也大概能理解那些打了1颗星或2颗星的伙伴。

每个人看电影,潜意识里都是抱着一些“目的”去看的,有的想要感官刺激,有的要轻缓,有的要治愈,有的要深刻,有的想要哲理……

这个电影的名字和海报,可能就会吸引一些单纯想要“感官刺激”的人过来。不过遗憾(庆幸)的是片子里并没有那么多outdoor activity ,没有很激烈错综复杂的关系,没有什么步步紧逼一环扣一环的悬疑推理……片子里大部分情节,都得细致地留意主角们的谈话和眼神,才能把握好他们的心理发展动态。这部电影是以主角们的心理发展作为线索的,不像那些“任务式”或者“寻宝式”影片:开头渲染一下气氛,接着很快就扔出一个任务,各类角色都围绕着这一任务进行一轮又一轮的“角逐”,最后取得胜利,线索特别清晰。

看这部电影,就像看一部略带色情情节的细腻爱情小说。

因为片子主角阳光帅气,里面也有一些全露画面,肯定也有一些“脱裤党”慕名而来。看的过程中,我自己也是血脉贲张😂这就是一开始我想把它归类为gay porn video和烂片的原因😂尤其是第一部分的配乐,完全就是北欧西欧那些走田野清新路线的porn video经常用的钢琴协奏曲😂,一开始就出现的大尺度裸女,加上两男主角生硬的言语挑逗和肢体接触,像极了那些有剧情有铺垫的“欧美同志精品”,所以差点没看下去(幸好看下去了)

Ps:过程中,脑子里不知道怎么想的,突然浮出来那个国际金融的“三元驳论”(不可能三角)如下图。这片不能是gay porn video ,也不能是烂片,也不算神片……也不知道为什么,我执着于给它归类,可能是太特别了?

国际金融的这个不可能三角的三者关系逻辑,和我对本片的归类逻辑大不相同,我只是单纯的联想到它罢了,大脑真神奇……

熬过前15分钟左右,就好很多了,后面的就是关注角色们的心理历程。最后结尾还是有些感悟和体会的,不是大俗,也不是大雅,就是单纯的爱。

其实基本上所有的爱情片,不限于爱情片,都是在“爱”这个主题下展开故事的。人类区别于其他动物,就是人类所谓的“神性”,集中体现在共情,同情,欲望,爱,这些方面,很多影片包括其他形式的人类艺术(绘画,文学,雕塑等),归根到底都是讨论这个话题。很多中国人都觉得谈情谈爱多俗气啊,但这不就是你们所骄傲的人的神性吗?当然也有很多探讨人的“动物性”的,经典的如小李子的《荒野猎人》等。

最后感想:当要是看到了最里面的东西后,外面的包装就会显得不必要了。

纯属个人胡思乱想,看到这里的人,你也是挺无聊的😂

以上

 2 ) Chatting With Dir.Mark Bessenger About Male Nudity & Gay Double Standards

Two best friends – one straight, one bisexual/gay – hook up just before the straight guy gets married. It’s the start of a decade long affair where the guys meet for one night a year to have sex, catch up and let loose. However what should be a secret but simple bit of fun soon becomes something more complicated for both of them.

That’s the set-up for writer/director Mark Bessenger’s The Last Straight Man, which shows us five of the mens’trysts over a 12-year period. With the film coming to DVD (it’s out this week in both the US and UK), we took the opportunity to chat to Bessenger about his movie, how the actors dealt with the sex and nudity, and whether gay people have a double standard about ‘straight’ men having same sex affairs.

Where did the idea for The Last Straight Man come from?
I wish I could say it was autobiographical, but it actually sprang from the budget. I knew my next feature would have to keep costs down, so I began to wonder if I could set a movie in one location and keep it interesting for ninety minutes. From there, it just built itself up: a hotel suite…one night every year afforded the opportunity to let characters grow…two men…best friends…one straight and one gay would provide the drama…unrequited love and sexual curiosity would provide the conflict…and there it was.

Have you ever fallen for a straight friend yourself?
I’ve had some pretty hard crushes on some of my straight guy friends, but yes, there was one that I was on the verge of falling in love with. Thank goodness it never happened. He was married with kids and it would have been a disaster. But, if he had been gay, it would have been glorious. We got along so well.

How did the main actors, Mark Cirillo and Scott Sell, get involved?
Scott was the first actor cast. When I was writing the script, I happened to see Scott in an episode of a local web show from Detroit, Michigan. It was a horror series, and Scott was great and had the perfect look for the Cooper character. I contacted him on Facebook, struck up a conversation and when the script was completed, I sent it to him to see if there was any interest. He wanted to try out, and I video auditioned him. He did a great job, and that was that.

Another actor had initially been cast as Lewis, the gay guy, but a month before the start of production, he backed out—a director’s nightmare. Several other good actors were contacted, including some who had originally auditioned for the part, but they turned it down, mostly because of the nudity and sex. One turned it down because of the “dirty bottom” joke! Producer Benjamin Lutz suggested I auditioned Mark Cirillo. They were friends because they had both been in another movie together (The Men Next Door), and Mark had done comedy and nudity in that film. So we brought Mark in, and he was great, so the two leads were complete.

Is it true that you initially thought about having different actors playing the two main characters at each of their meetings? Why was that scrapped?
Yes. Originally, I thought it would be fun to have different actors play the same characters every time they met. Maybe even actors of diverse races. It would give me the opportunity to work with more good people and add an interesting spin to the film, but the producers discussed it with me, and we ultimately decided it was too gimmicky an idea. The audience would have to get acquainted with the characters anew each time which would make it harder to build upon their story arcs. Plus, each concurrent set of actors would have to work within ever-tightening parameters, as they could only perform within the boundaries set by the preceding actors, which wouldn’t be as much fun. So we scrapped the idea.

Due to the setup of showing us some of the men’s yearly meeting, there’s a fair amount of nudity and sexual situations. Was that difficult to handle on set? Were the actors concerned about it at first?
Mark Cirillo had done nudity in previous films so it wasn’t a big deal to him (although now that the movie is done, he has told me he’s amazed at how much skin and sex there is in it), and when we were recording the audio commentary for the DVD, Scott revealed that ‘those’ scenes had almost prevented him from accepting the role. Both actors were very brave, but I have to give special props to Scott, who basically flew across the country to meet a group of people he didn’t know and get comfortable enough around us to take off his clothes and show butt and peen.

We rehearsed the scenes (clothed) extensively before we began filming, so the actors were relaxed and familiar with each other’s bodies, so I think that made it easier for them. And while we shot with a small crew, it was still difficult to get people to work on the film, due to the fact that it was GAY sex and MALE nudity. Even the women on the shoot were, I was told, uncomfortable. But I am always about challenging boundaries, so I take that as a badge of honor. And everyone behaved professionally. Even the telling of dirty jokes on set was practically nonexistent.

How much of a challenge was writing the script? You want us to get to know these men, but you are seeing them in quite limited periods. Was it difficult to keep it natural but still fully flesh out the characters?
Not at all. It was probably one of the easiest scripts I’ve ever written. Once I knew who these two guys were, and what I wanted each annual reunion to be about, the creation of the script just flew. I believe once the outline was done, I wrote it in a week. There was a very minimal rewrite after I let a few friends read it.

The film deals with the complexities of sexuality. It can often be a tangled thing with many people having different ideas about how peoples’ sexuality works and how/whether it can change. As the movie deals with people whose sexuality is being challenged or changing (at least in their own minds), how did you ensure that felt real?
I think a person’s sexuality is pretty much set at a young age with fuzzy borders. When I was a kid, I knew I didn’t feel the same way about girls as I did about boys, but I still thought I would get married to a woman some day and have kids. This was the ‘Barbie Dream House’ fantasy, and I didn’t realize it was really a gay fantasy. In high school and college, I became convinced I was bisexual and even bedded several women in an attempt to prove it to myself, but it was never as satisfying as it was when I had sex with men. Finally, I decided to just admit the truth to myself and came out as gay. So, did my sexuality change? No. Just my own interpretation (or frantic attempt at labelings) of what I thought I was, not what I really was.

And I believe this is true for a lot of people. One ‘straight’ male friend and fuck buddy told me that he considered himself totally heterosexual…he just liked to suck dick once in a while. To me, that is not straight, but to HIM, it absolutely is. So was his sexuality changing? I don’t think so. I think he was bisexual with a preference for women, but if he had come to this realization, his sexuality wouldn’t change, just his interpretation of it. And I found this fascinating and tried to incorporate this into Cooper’s character to help give him that authenticity.



I was also interested in how the guys’ meetings are supposed to be about escape and fun for both of them, but it quickly becomes apparent that there’s more to it than that. Do you think people can have ‘friends with benefits’ relationships that don’t get more complicated?
I really don’t. Sex, even if it’s originally just for fun, implies a certain amount of intimacy between the people involved. Now, I’m talking about ongoing sexual relationship, not going to a bathhouse or a sex club. When we have sex, we are revealing ourselves to another person in many ways. We are exposing our bodies, our pleasures, our fetishes, our psyches…everything that makes us who we are. I don’t think you can expose those aspects of ourselves to each other and not have it emotionally take hold somewhere.

It’s often difficult to get gay-themed films made. How did you go about getting financing the film?
I wish I could say I sold my body for a night to an Arabian prince and raised the entire budget by morning, but in actuality, we approached distributors, friends and investors but no one wanted to bite. Even a couple of porn companies. My biggest surprise was how many ‘out and proud’ homosexual men were actually afraid to put money into a gay production because their families and friends might disapprove. We tried an IndieGoGo campaign that failed miserably. Ultimately, a production company came through for us after reading the script and thinking it was great. Who was I to disagree?

I’m often intrigued when watching movies in which married men have an affair with another guy, whether the ‘cheating’ character would seem as sympathetic if he was having an affair with a woman. Do you think that’s true and that perhaps gay-themed cinema has a bit of a double-standard on that issue?
It is a double-standard, because cheating on a committed partner IS cheating. But I think we are more apt to forgive a married man sleeping with a gay man because men cheat to fulfill something they’re not getting in their normal relationships. If he’s having hetero sex at home and seeks out other hetero sex, it’s harder to forgive, because he’s looking for more of what he’s already getting. But if a married man is seeking out gay sex, we believe (or often WANT to believe) that it’s because he’s searching for something more than just sex. He’s looking to fulfill some part of his makeup that his wife, or any woman for that matter, isn’t satisfying. And so he finds it with other men. For a lot of gay men, we understand that search, since so many of us have experienced it ourselves, and so, we’re more willing to forgive that transgression. But if we were to see a movie about a married gay couple in a committed relationship and one of them cheats on his spouse with another gay man, I don’t think it would be as well-received.

The film seems to have had a great reaction at film festivals. Are you pleased with how audiences have reacted to the movie?
Yes. I was surprised at how few GLBT festivals in the U.S. wouldn’t take the film. When you’re rejected, you don’t get an explanation. But I was always told that it could be for any reason: too long of a running time, not funny enough, a festival programmer was feeling particularly unattractive that day and didn’t want to book a film where someone else found love…anything. But I always had a feeling the sexual frankness of the film scared some of them off. Even GLBT fests in the Bible Belt can be pretty conservative.

Are you a fan of gay-themed cinema yourself? What are some of your favourites?
Yes, I love gay cinema. I love movies in general, but gay cinema feels like it speaks more to me than other genres (except horror, but that’s an essay in itself) because it’s easier to see myself on the screen. I could name several films, but I’m going to restrict myself to two, both by the same director: Joseph Graham. This guy is such a good filmmaker, it hurts. His first film, Strapped, is a character study of people living in an apartment building as they encounter a male escort who has just had a client and cannot find the exit. After working his way through the literal and figurative maze-like hallways, he learns something about himself. It’s a beautiful piece of work. Now, Joe has a new film coming out called Beautiful Something. He’s putting the finishing touches on it right now. He graciously asked me to watch it…and it’s simply brilliant. It’s about our relationship with art and how that effects all aspects of our lives. It’s gorgeous, sexy, amazingly directed and the acting is devastatingly wonderful. Keep an eye out for that one. It’s flat-out my favorite gay film to date.

Are you working on anything new. Is there anything you can tell us about it?
Oh yes, things have been very busy at the Bessenger film factory. Currently, an older feature I directed and was thought lost has been rediscovered. It’s called Rhapsody and is available for streaming and download on amazon.com, or for purchase on Blu-ray on eBay. It was my first gay feature, shot in Chicago in 1994. When it was found, we remastered the footage, re-scored the music and re-edited the picture. There were a LOT of montages. A LOT, lol. Anyway, it’s recently been made available.

The very first feature film I ever directed, a horror/comedy/action/martial arts film called Ninja Zombie may be finally seeing the light of day next year. I was told it was too ‘mean-spirited’ by a distributor and so let it collect dust in my garage until recently someone came calling for it. Look for that one early in 2016.

And currently, I am in the middle of production on a new project called Confession. It’s a 16-scene anthology made up of gay male monologues in which each character confesses a secret to someone; sometimes a friend, sometimes directly to us. Each piece differs from the rest in tone or genre. One is a comedy, one is horror, one is romantic, one is disturbing, a few are erotic, there is a concert film, dancing and puppets; some are dark, some are light…I hope all are entertaining. And yes, there’s sex and nudity, lol.

We should finish post by the end of April and will be making the film festival circuit this year while seeking distribution.

I hope these films will appeal to ‘our’ audience, and that your readers will seek them out and enjoy them!

 3 ) ...and somehow it was everything

一开始就抱着烂片心态往下看的,刚开始GV似的配乐也是很醉。再后来越来越神,全程对白完全不腻啊,我倒觉得演员表演的都很到位。话不多说直接列这片戳我心的三个点:

1) "You can't find love in a locked room, Louis, you can read about life, or you can live it."
俩人slow dance之后坐下来louis细细道来祖母的帽子和爱情小说,撩汉指数五颗星,哲理指数四星半

2)"I've tried to do the right thing but, then I talked to you and suddenly YOU are the right thing."
phone sex之后cooper算是完全认识到了真爱,看似cliché的cheesy line一点也不腻歪戳中内心🌚

3)"Remember you told me about your dad leaving, how he made you feel? Why would you do that to them? Soul mate or not, they are your family. They love you. That's more important than us."
还记得谷阿莫讲断背山的时候说究竟Jack和Ennis明明结婚出轨还一副我追求真爱我无敌的样子是不是贱货的问题,这部结局可以说完美啊,家庭美满基友在侧,还甜。

 4 ) 帽子那一段的台词

“她一个人住在一栋老房子里

在二楼走廊尽头有一扇很大的门

每当我问她房间里有什么的时候

她都会把手放在嘴唇上

嘘……

但有一天

只有我们两个人

她给我看了一把很老式的钥匙

用蓝丝带系在脖子上

她问我

路易斯 你想看这房间里的秘密吗

她开门的时候

我激动得差点尿裤子

这间卧室特别漂亮

里面有一张很大的床

窗帘在随风飘动

粉红色壁纸

一张老式梳妆台

还有一个巨大壁炉

上面刻着喧闹嬉戏的丘比特

在一堵墙边

摆着无数的帽盒

几乎就要堆到房梁上了

一大堆一大堆的帽盒

萝丝祖母让我看看盒子里面

于是我拿了一个下来

打开了盖子

里面是一个镶着羽毛和珠子的紫色毛毡帽

看起来就像全新的一样

旁边还放了一本爱情小说

每个盒子里装的东西都一样

帽子和书

萝丝祖母告诉我

祖父去世后

每隔几个月他都会去城里买一顶帽子和一本书

吃完晚饭

她就坐在梳妆台前

给自己化好妆

穿上最美的衣服

戴着新买的帽子

然后坐在窗边椅子上读那些书

她最喜欢的是一顶浅粉色镶着绿珍珠的帽子

而她最喜欢的书叫做《关于真爱和浪漫的故事》

每当家里只有我们两个人

我们就会去那个秘密房间

戴上各式各样的帽子

跟着电台音乐翩翩起舞

她去世的时候

是我整理的遗物

为了找到那把钥匙

我几乎要把房子都掀掉

我怕那个秘密会被她带进坟墓

不过最后

我还是找到了

那是我第一次一个人走进那房间

我紧张得手指都在颤抖

但它还是和以前一样

一模一样

只是当我打开那些帽盒

发现里面都是空的

除了一页纸

来自她最喜欢的那本书

我把每个盒子都打开了

我想找到那顶带珍珠的浅绿色帽子

但盒子全空了

除了《关于真爱和浪漫的故事》里的一页

这时候我才发现

在壁炉里

那些哭泣的丘比特下面

是珍珠的残渣和烧成灰的帽子

她把帽子都烧了

所有帽子

梳妆台镜子上贴着一张照片

是她拿着那本书拍的

看着很忧伤

照片背面写着一句话

你在锁着的房间是找不到爱的 路易斯

要么旁观别人

要么潇洒的活

要幸福

——萝丝祖母”

 5 ) 一份私藏了14年的爱情

本来只是以为这是一个尺度挺大的电影,但实际上这个电影到后面,一段爱情经过14年的坚守,一边是路易斯爱情的渴求逐渐淡化变为一种释然,一边是库柏不断地认清自己越陷越深。但实际上到最后,有人打破了三个问题的规律,路易斯也决定结束这样长期的追寻。如果只是零零散散的看这片子的话,你会觉得他只是一部尺度比较大的烂熟的爱情片,但如果你真的需要深度去思考这个问题,他就很现实把一些问题赤裸裸的抛了出来。家庭孩子妻子还有你最爱的人。我看到这部影片的发布时间实际上是美国还没有真正的承认同性恋法,我们应该深度思考的是在那样一个不被法律所认可的陪伴下爱情的取舍,便成为两个人不能够在一起的真正原因,现实的揭露了多元化爱情的受阻,起码在这个层面上这是一部很棒的影片!并且结尾也是大团圆的,

等了14年才等来了那句我爱你,但是我们可能不能在一起,但是我还是可以很爱很爱你。

 6 ) 比在一起更重要的

【你在锁着的房间里面是找不到爱情的,你可以阅读人生或者你也可以潇洒的活着,记住一定要快乐】


“最后的直男”——这是一部充满惊喜的电影。这是关于每年的一个夜晚,持续12年。我必须承认,在影片的前几分钟,我开始在心里给它默默打上了”烂片“的标签,渐渐看下去我开始懊恼了,故事在朝一个与我所期望的完全不同的方向发展。居然就感觉这电影或许还真的挺不错。。

12年之久的一夜情,似断背山一样的情节实则却加入更多思考,编剧兼导演对于台词很用心的处理,演员的无拘束演绎。最终就效果上来看是完全超出预期的走心!那这绝对称得上低成本电影的典范!

电影开始在库珀的单身派对,看到大房间里一群庆祝派对的汉子”享受“着雇佣脱衣舞娘的异国情调舞蹈,但也也注意到了,一个客人不参与其中。于是镜头偏重到另一位主角刘易斯。随后酒店套房刘易斯和库珀他们在收拾残局时开始谈论库珀结婚后的生活以及玩笑于双方性经历,刘易斯对库珀的祝福是“你的头发永远不会掉,你的屌会一直坚挺,你的儿子不会对你姐夫叫爸爸”。他们的语言,是糊涂又沉默男人作为一个物种早已经都掌握了的,为了保存刻板阳刚的形象的限制性代码,是用来掩盖任何一方可能的真实感受。
他们并不深知喝着几杯龙舌兰酒这么玩“三个问题”的游戏,这是很重要的线索,然后事情它就这么发生了。
当晚的交流中刘易斯坦言他是双性恋,他这样做是在回答三个问题之后。也是因为他讲述的那件难忘性事导致了之后事情第一次的发生,他们互相口交了。据库柏所说这不会再发生,但其实他们也意识到他们的关系注定是要围绕库珀婚姻情况发展了。于是两人同意安排一年一次一夜情,让它在接下一个十二年的同一天(库珀结婚纪念日的前一天)上演着,花样翻新,愈演愈烈。

这十二年的十一次(有一次库珀没有能赴约)中,导演重点展示了四个难忘的夜晚,描绘了两人的成长和他们的友谊的变化。伴随他们成熟和年龄的增长,刘易斯成为了一个写风花雪月文字的作家,而库珀一直是粗糙的劳工。第四年库珀如愿以偿的成为了一个父亲,而刘易斯仍然是一个孤独的一人生活,鲜有感情交往对象。这几年间似乎是有一定的规则般,不要接吻,不能刘易斯作Top。他们会在每年的这一天带着酒,雪茄,避孕套和润滑油来同一个酒店的同一间套房。
第四年刘易斯向库珀承认自己是同性恋,第一次相拥慢舞后他们盘坐地上,他向库珀讲述了祖母的帽子和书的故事,故事的最后祖母在去世前把她所有的帽子都烧掉了,只在她梳妆台上粘着一张她拿着她最爱的那本书的照片,他说她看起来很悲伤。在那张照片背面写着:你在锁着的房间里面是找不到爱情的,你可以阅读人生或者你也可以潇洒的活着,记住一定要快乐。
那晚刘易斯在对嘴饮酒的游戏中得到了四年来的第一个吻和算得上尴尬的初次Top体验。其中穿插了库珀作为一个已婚男人的牢骚,他说爱他的妻子,也由衷的为即将降生的孩子而心生喜悦,只是抱怨但她并不能他称作另一半,抱怨她很少和他有一种感觉,这一切没有达到他婚前对于灵魂伴侣的预期。


这五个夜晚(包括结婚前的那次),一场场的彻夜交流中可以看到两个男人一起度过的情感状态和他们的关系的变化。性永远是一个复杂的主题,在这部电影中你看到的是如此的真实。这是作为电影提出双性恋者却只看到他们的行为对他们的同性恋欲望的疑问。刘易斯说”是我太了解你“。事实上,正如库珀一直所说的,他是直男,他是无法想象和除刘易斯之外男人要怎么发生关系,刘易斯也绝不是泄欲的工具,他将这归结是因为他们是彼此最好的朋友。他们之间不过是找些乐子,那些沉重的话题就留在真实的世界吧!
两人决定在同一个酒店秘密见面,是在要同一天晚上赶上他们各自日常生活的借口,但他们实际上也在这样的生活里进一步探索自己的性欲望。在过去的十二年中,通过友谊关系的变化带来的这一切的改变。有浪漫也有情色!
这部电影的美在于什么不必说。刘易斯和库珀是深深爱着,他们的非言语交流都意味深长。他们刻意的笑话总是失败的,因为每当他们接近他们的真实感情就会迫使一个或两个改变话题。

在八年的那晚,库珀面对和刘易斯的性关系时仍”就像建筑工人领工资一样兴奋“,而刘易斯却性致索然,原来是刘易斯说他走入了一段感情生活——交了男朋友。那晚欢交过后在床上他们又玩起了”三个问题“的游戏,但这过程进行并不愉快。刘易斯说:”因为我知道你与你父亲不一样,所以不管是不是你的灵魂伴侣,她们都是你的家人,她们爱你,而这比我们在一起更重要!“刘易斯并不是没有想过,也不是没有希望过库珀能选择和他在一起生活,他绝口不提,如今时过境迁,也该释然了!”人是会变的,我该变得不再那么需要你了。“

在这样一个视觉拼贴形式的电影中,刻意跳过几个的生活阶段事件,使男性的演变随着时间的推移持续发生。随着年龄增长和生活经验的积累,他们的爱情,亲情和对彼此的了解都翻天覆地的改变。
刘易斯意识到,他要成为更好的人和库珀的家庭的利益无关,做正确的事。这样的无私让刘易斯有一个讨人喜欢的性格。似乎他总是理智的,甚至你可能会有错觉,刘易斯是单方面遭受心痛和暗恋的。然而,太多的徘徊是有由库珀对于谁是他的家人的困扰和他发现真正的迟来的灵魂伴侣的迷茫。作为观众,他们在卧室里交流情感的过程中,你不能参与帮助,但你能感觉到他们内部的纠葛——他们都曾面临困境。

“最后的直男”是一个讲述快乐的电影,创作者认真对待故事,会为你留下很多潜在的主题处理,告诉你人表达自己的方式和应该怎样思考看待对方。而不知道如何表达真实感情的生活,必然是会造成一个长期和不可逆转的后果。

 短评

观影心情一直在烂片和神片之间徘徊。

5分钟前
  • Xavier
  • 推荐

高颜值话唠片,全片场景不超过三处,用几个时间带来表现整个情感拉锯。直男婚前和弯男朋友的一夜,然后每年直男结婚纪念日前的二人相聚,情感循序渐进,话题推陈出新,欲望尺度无限叠加,同时他们也开始审视现实,所有爱情小说里的浪漫情节正是他们现实中无法跨越的荆棘。放手何尝不是更深沉的爱呢?

10分钟前
  • 张咏轩Wayne®
  • 力荐

以美國小成本來說算不錯了~至少有心...

15分钟前
  • chuchu
  • 还行

简直床战教学片,而且演直男那位从眉毛到脚趾头都那么基,很容易让人出戏啊!

19分钟前
  • 全声波频道D
  • 还行

看完心里就像热水冲蜂蜜兑点牛奶咖啡再加点醋,趁热一口闷下去。老中药一样五味杂陈。那种苦涩不想去回想,但是又停不下来去回想

23分钟前
  • 贺兰迈克
  • 力荐

的确半神作半烂片。单纯从出发点看还是有惊喜的,能让人想到一些片子,《断背山》、《一天》、《点亮灯光》、《乔布斯》…主题很好,总之各种诚意惊喜。但也实在是不喜欢,也许把俩状态奇差主角换成男女异性恋再演技好点不淫荡我会更喜欢吧。画面都糙成这样了还不如全搞伪纪录片,形式再上一层…

27分钟前
  • 徐若风
  • 还行

最后祖母把她所有的帽子都烧掉了,在她梳妆台上粘着一张她拿着她最爱的那本书的照片,她看起来很悲伤。那张照片背面写着:你在锁着的房间里面是找不到爱情的,你可以阅读人生或者你也可以潇洒的活着,记住一定要快乐。【抱着烂片的心情居然发现了神片】

29分钟前
  • 力荐

真实而又发人深省的电影。结尾的画面太美好,有些不知所云。但是两个人互动的那些小纠结真是说到点上了,编剧兼导演真是用心了

30分钟前
  • 雨夜飞行
  • 力荐

淫乱版的断背山,在性与爱间打转的12年。I wish I know how to quit fucking you...(怎么办有点泪目2333)

34分钟前
  • 同志亦凡人中文站
  • 推荐

@2016-02-08 21:43:21

39分钟前
  • 天马星
  • 还行

不知道为什么喜欢这部电影,就算它拍成如此的画质。演员的长相和身材有一定的多吸引力,主要是那种两人间演绎的那种亲密感,让人嫉妒和羡慕。我需要这样的亲密感。。。

41分钟前
  • Neil
  • 力荐

两个男主可以再丑一点吗。。。

42分钟前
  • 胡汉
  • 很差

以前看过了,又看了一遍系列。所谓的直男表现得像个小孩,什么都想尝试。台词幽默风趣。每年在直男的结婚纪念日前一天来当时第一次的旅馆开房,跟最好的朋友来一发。场景都是旅馆,每一年会穿插近照。“你问我是不是gay,是不是bisexual,可是为什么到现在我就喜欢你,只有你。”从不插、不亲、不在一起,到八年后都反过来了。能做到每一年都演得不太一样很难得了。Lewis牺牲很多,正如他结尾说的,我一直就很讨厌威士忌,只是一直在为对方而喝一样,他为了Cooper能够不离弃他的家庭而编造了自己有个得病的男友叫Bernie,其实是服务生的名字,违背了俩人之间的3个问题游戏的原则,不能说谎。

43分钟前
  • hayden
  • 力荐

长大成熟,最可怜的事,是学会向自己深爱的人说不,没有好坏对错,只是可怜。导演和表演都很糟烂,一度让我差点提前放弃,好在撑过第一段后剧本的威力释放了出来。每一次见面都有不同,每一次都有感情层次的递进乃至升华,而这一切都发生在单一场景下,摒除一切其他因素的影响,让人看清楚什么是爱。

46分钟前
  • 神仙鱼
  • 还行

哭得上气不接下气,其实最后一次见面的分手就是结局了,包括所谓的新男友可能也是杜撰,他终于等到那句话,只不过他已经不需要了。

48分钟前
  • 傻乐的猫
  • 还行

操,看得人好难过啊!本来以为只是部用来恶搞的在gv附近打擦边球的小成本独立电影,毕竟开头收音不清晰台词不连贯演员之间甚至没有半点化学反应,漏洞很明显,我完全是用来满足自己恶趣味看着玩的。结果第二次重聚时被打脸。和情人伴着婚礼音乐相拥着轻轻摇晃太过于浪漫,连我都仿佛被带入那个一夜放纵的梦境。逐渐发现演员演技其实是在线的,剧情也慢慢连贯起来甚至前后有呼应,主题开始浮现。切入视角和叙述方式相当独特,剧情之间相互牵引,最后引导观众理解主人公面临的矛盾,而非只顾以导演自己的意愿意识流表达。现实中带着浪漫,浪漫中带着情色。露骨又温情。

50分钟前
  • Ben Adryl.
  • 推荐

见过用拍电影的方法拍porn的,还真没见过用拍porn的方法拍电影的,租了一个旅馆房间就想拍断背山了,当然这所有的都不如最后那个右派结局更让人吃惊的了。从技术到人生观,writer-director Bessenger纯粹是一团mess。

53分钟前
  • SELVEN
  • 很差

刷完就明白短评那句「在神片和烂片间徘徊」的意思了。和谐大团圆结尾在我看来就是个梦幻般的彩蛋,最后那场床戏,整个的表现就像是路易斯在无声地说再见;加上吃药、编出假男朋友的故事、明明见到库还是很高兴但却拒绝了那句我爱你,反而第一次是他对明年说出不确定的话——看到这段的时候,眼泪都要出来了。太晚明白我爱你,太晚发现你才是我的灵魂伴侣,于是只能在现实与私欲之间纠缠十几年,每年仅有一晚的放纵。一个害怕亲密感,一个想要去爱却只能读着别人的爱情故事;最后他终于违反了这场游戏的规则,哪怕等来了那句真正的「我爱你」。

58分钟前
  • 某J。624
  • 推荐

明明是GV非要加个剧情……

1小时前
  • 尧谦书
  • 较差

本来只是想看着玩玩的结果最后还有点走心,真是哎哟我操

1小时前
  • 逢澶Ty
  • 还行

返回首页返回顶部

Copyright © 2023 All Rights Reserved